Tarkovsky Marathon #4: Stalker (1979) [8/10]

Stalker (1979)

Director: Andrei Tarkovsky

Cast: Aleksandr Kaydanovskiy, Nikolai Grinko, Anatoliy Solonitsyn

My Rating: 8/10

In Short: Excellent and visually superb but a tad too repetitive

If a film is good, and well made, then there is no limit for how long I am willing to sit to watch it. Even if it stretches on for hours and hours; if it is interesting and enthralling, then I will sit through the whole thing no matter what. Stalker, Andrei Tarkovsky’s popular 1979 science fiction drama, is a very good film. And it is not Tarkovsky’s longest; Andrei Rublev and Solaris are both longer, but Stalker feels like the longest of all the films of his I’ve seen.

If there is one thing to praise about the film, it is that the visuals on screen are spectacular. There are long stretches without dialogue (I think the first line in the film is just before the ten minute mark), and Tarkovsky manages to keep us entertained and enthralled by presenting visual puzzles and intriguing, questionable sequences that allow us to both reflect and think properly about what we’ve seen, and be absorbed by what is still happening, without getting confused or distracted from the plot. For the first thirty minutes, there is very little happening and the plot itself remains clouded and unclear. But then things begin to emerge. We understand the motives and emotions of the characters, and become completely gripped in an amazing, mystical realm, easily one of the most memorable landscapes in all of Tarkovsky’s cinema.

Despite this, the plot begins to wear thin in the film’s middle section toward its third act. The sequences where we leave the plot for a while just to focus on the visual complexity of the surroundings, and its effects on the protagonists, are startling, enlightening and beautiful. But the poetic dialogue they spout during these sequences, despite being thought-provoking and well-written, become – dare I say it? – boring after some time. When boredom struck, it was never for long and it was always kept at bay by how impressed I was with the technical side of the film, but the stretches of philosophical and psychological pondering that become more frequent toward the end raise more questions than they answer, and not in a good way.

The actual plot concerns itself with a Stalker, who is accompanying two men through the Zone, a treacherous and dangerous land that is heavily guarded and has a thick atmosphere of danger and foreboding. He is leading them to The Room, a place where supposedly your fondest wish gets granted. But as the tumultuous journey wears on, they soon begin to lose sight of what’s important, and the closer they get to the Room, the more the psychic beings that live there begin playing with their minds and causing them to lose track of what’s real.

Despite the criticisms I spoke of, on a whole the film is actually a tremendous achievement, and one I believe I need to rewatch a second time before I can judge it fully. After two viewings, it still remains an enigmatic, puzzling mystery that continues to convince me it is smarter and wiser than I am able to comprehend. It is truly an amazing picture, that I will be contemplating for a long time to come. Even the sequences I found boring are actually so impressively shot that I cannot remove my eyes from the screen. With Stalker, his final foray into science fiction, Andrei Tarkovsky has hand-carved and slaved to create a poetic vision of a future where selfishness turns us into fickle beings, destroyed by our own temptations and wants, and imprisoned by the God of some sort of unspeakable or incomprehensible religion, to be confined in a lonely, suffocating world, forced to reexamine our motives and desires.


Posted on January 13, 2012, in Movie Reviews and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 6 Comments.

  1. It should come to no surprise by now the choices of movies you watch, but you always manage to surprise me with obscure, dark, indie movies that, most of the time, I haven’t even heard of. Your kind of my film teacher, but shhh, don’t say that to anyone!

    I do know about Tarkovsky and about the movie Stalker, but, as usual, haven’t got around to seeing it! Honestly, I don’t know if I would like it, but I will try, promise!

    • Your film teacher? I’m honoured! 🙂

      Stalker’s not my favorite Tarkovsky, but it is one of his more accessible ones. Still, I recommend his films Nostalghia and Solaris, as they are his two best and definitely worth seeing.

  2. Yeah this is such a strange and bewildering film, the visuals leave me speechless and even after two viewings the meaning is still beyond my grasp.

  3. After revisiting this one, it clicked with me in a new way. I understand why someone would find the lull in the middle frustrating, but I found it really compelling this time around. The conclusion as well became a lot more meaningful. It makes me want to rewatch all the Tarkovsky I’ve seen.

    Right now, Stalker stands as my favorite of his work.

    • I probably need to see STALKER a third time. If I had to rank all of Tarkovsky’s films, it would look like this: Solaris > Andrei Rublev > Nostalghia > The Mirror > Stalker > The Sacrifice > Ivan’s Childhood.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: