NEW WAVE WEEK! Day 6: Francois Truffaut

Hello everyone and welcome to Day Six of French New Wave Week. So far we’ve examined the career and films of Jean-Luc Godard, Louis Malle, Alain Resnais, Agnes Varda and Jean-Pierre Melville. We have just one filmmaker left (not counting our secret bonus director). Today we are examining one of the most defining figures of not just the French New Wave but all cinema. The great, incomparable Francois Truffaut.

Truffaut was born in Paris in 1932, and fell in love with the cinema at a young age. From just seven he was watching moving pictures avidly, taking in everything he saw. He started a film club in 1947, just 15, and met his good friend Andre Bazin. Soon after he joined the army, but began to regret it. Then he became a critic for Cahiers du Cinema, writing sharp, brutally honest reviews and earning a reputation. He wrote a book about the growing trend of French cinema, which caused some controversy. His defensive attitude toward the ‘auteur theory’ made him a revered figure in the film critic industry.

In 1959 he directed his first feature film, The 400 Blows, which was hugely successful, and has since gained a reputation as one of the defining films of the French New Wave. Not only is it this, it is also one of the most influential films of all time, influencing the way children were presented as protagonists in film, and creating one of the most sympathetic, enduring characters in all movies, Antoine Doinel (played by his good friend Jean-Pierre Leaud, then only 15). After the film’s success, Truffaut followed it up with his most experimental film, the somewhat alienating Shoot the Piano Player, which many people at the time criticised, but has since become embraced and affirmed as one of Truffaut’s best films.

Truffaut continued to win the audience over with his subsequent films, including the beautiful love triangle Jules and Jim, the sombre thriller The Bride Wore Black, the English language hit Fahrenheit 451, and the startling true story The Wild Child, as well as The 400 Blows “sequels” Stolen Kisses, Bed and Board and Love on the Run (not to mention the 1962 short Antoine and Colette).

However, it wasn’t until 1973 that Truffaut made his next flat-out masterpiece Day for Night, heavily inspired by Federico Fellini’s 8 1/2. The story of a struggling filmmaker dealing with various personal crises, Day for Night was somewhat autobiographical, a rumour accentuated by the fact that the filmmaker was played by none other than Truffaut himself. Many critics called this his best film, and while that is debatable, one can’t deny how reflective it is of Truffaut’s career, and that it is an undeniable masterpiece. His subsequent films such as The Story of Adele H, The Man Who Loved Women, The Green Room and The Last Metro were all very well done, but none reached the level of beauty and brilliance in Truffaut’s early work.

He once said: “The thing which gives me the courage to keep going is that in the cinema industry one does not feel isolated. Solitude is one of the greatest problems for artists.”

Francois Roland Truffaut died of a brain tumour in 1984, while working on his last few films.

There. That’s the last of our six filmmakers. Well… not quite. Stay tuned tomorrow for our Special Bonus Director, who is another French filmmaker that has not been mentioned yet this week. Can you guess who he is?

Also coming this week is a full, comprehensive list of the 100 Essential Foreign Films, compiled and written by me. So stick around for some awesome stuff you don’t want to miss.

In the meantime… what do you think of Truffaut? Do you like his films, or loathe them? Have you seen any? Which are your favourites? Leave a comment below.


Posted on September 24, 2011, in Movies and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 9 Comments.

  1. went to Starland today to pick up some films and quite absurdly i could find no Truffaut at all. For a store with the widest selection of dvd’s around i was quite disappointed. especially at the lack of SHOOT THE PIANO PLAYER after your recommendation this week (and my inability to find the novel which i know is in my shop somewhere.)

  2. A brilliant director, and from what I’ve seen in interviews, also a highly intelligent lover of film. I’ve seen quite a few of these, but not Shoot the Piano Player or Day For Night.

    • I’m watching DAY FOR NIGHT next week. SHOOT THE PIANO PLAYER is a real must-see. Truffaut’s most experimental and dare I say his most ‘fun’ film.

  3. Truffaut is so likeable. He had a great enthusiasm for movie-making (and people, for that matter) and it spilled into his movies. But going even deeper than that, he employed a much more deft touch when it came to the New Wave. He wasn’t beating his audience over the head with it the way that Godard did. In Godard’s films, his breaking the rules WAS the story and everything else was ancillary. For Truffaut, the story was still the important part, while his genius employing the New Wave technique sort of faded to the background. It was there to applaud and appreciate but you certainly don’t need to notice it to enjoy, say, The 400 Blows or Shoot the Piano Player or Day for Night.

    He’s not really my favorite filmmaker, but he’s right there in the top 10. And he’s the one I WANT to like the most.

    • You’re absolutely right. I much prefer Truffaut to Godard. I don’t admire the cynicism in films like WEEK END, even though I love WEEK END. Movies like THE 400 BLOWS, SHOOT THE PIANO PLAYER, DAY FOR NIGHT, JULES AND JIM and most of the others Truffaut made were generally plot-driven and took the audience on a fun, exciting ride. Godard’s films are generally viewed as much more langurous and slower, particularly by that select few who hate movies like BREATHLESS and CONTEMPT.

  4. Unfortunately, it seems a lot of french new wave films are not available for streaming on netflix so i haven’t been able to check the people you’ve been posting about like i wanted. It did have 8 1/2 tho

    • 8 1/2 is actually Italian, but I still definitely recommend you see it if you haven’t already. Preferably watch it more than once. I watched it three times in one week, not because I loved it so much, but because I needed to to appreciate all the imagery, emotions, feelings and other miscellaneous minutiae that Fellini was trying to convey on screen.

      It’s sad they don’t have a lot of New Wave movies, though. Really sad. If you live near Chicago, I hear is a great place to rent foreign or independant film (talk to John @TDYLF about that) or there’s Hulu and other resources.

  5. I did watch it, and i did enjoy it. And i don’t live near Chicago

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: