Review: Man Bites Dog

Rémy Belvaux, André Bonzel and Benoit Poelvoorde’s mockumentary-style satire manages to top all other entries into the genre, even Rob Reiner’s famous mocko This Is Spinal Tap (1984). Titled C’est Arrivé Près De Chez Vous (literally, ‘It Happened In Your Neighbourhood’) is better known by the title Man Bites Dog (1992), which is a joke in itself. The film is a strong criticism of journalism and the obsession the media have with documentation.

Poelvoorde plays Ben, a sadistic, motiveless serial killer who goes about his business of murdering, raping, disembowling and burying countless people. What makes it interesting is the addition of a camera crew, who follow Ben around and document his every move. They seem to have no moral stance; they don’t condone Ben’s actions, but they certainly don’t try to stop him. Early in the film, after a long day of murdering, Ben asks his colleagues out to dinner. They awkwardly refuse, attempting to make up excuses. Why? It seems obvious why; they are afraid he will kill them without warning, as he has so many people. But the crew begin to realize they are Ben’s friends, and even as some of them are accidentally murdered, they continue to stick with him, film his activities and even participate in them.

The latter is expressed in a gruesome rape scene three quarters of the way into the film. Surprisingly cut from the original Region 4 DVD I watched, I was surprised to see it included when I bought the Criterion DVD just a few days ago. We watch, horrified, as the camera crew and Ben himself penetrate a helpless woman and force her husband to watch, before (off-screen, thankfully) disembowling her and shooting her husband.

No, Man Bites Dog is not a pleasant film, and at times it can get rather grating and repetitive, but the originality more than makes up for that. The acting, too, which is superb for a few amateur filmmakers, supports the film’s tale and makes it all the more believable, and thus, more horrifying. Poelvoorde plays Ben with ease, making him a serial killer reflective of the seeming normality of society which is bursting to explode. He reminds me of Patrick Bateman in American Psycho; Bateman, unlike many serial killers in films, does not have a multiple personality disorder where he, without warning, descents into insanity. No, he is always insane and ready to pop, night and day, and so is Ben in this film. He does not have a darker side; he only has one side, and that is just normality. He is the same person when he is murdering people as he is when he is laughing, buying his friends’ drinks, and visiting his family: he is calm. Sure, there are moments when he gets irritated, but he is so used to murdering that he sees it as such a normal act as cooking dinner, taking out the trash or watching TV.

Man Bites Dog, like most student films from rookie filmmakers, contains many references to other films. While smashing a man’s head in in his bathroom, Ben asks the crew which film the scene reminds them of; the film’s successive sound recordists all end up getting murdered, a reference to the aforementioned This is Spinal Tap, and there is one reference which struck me the most. We see a man walking along before Ben jumps out and strangles him, then suddenly we realize the footage is video as it is rewound and played back, this time in slow motion. This is a clear reference to Henry: Portrait of a Serial Killer (1990), in which a couple raped and murdered is shown as video footage before being played back (a technique used again by Michael Haneke in Cache (2005)). These cultural references might not seem like references so much as simply referring to other films, considering that the film itself is a documentary.

The film as a whole, is interesting and worth seeing, but at times can be incredibly difficult to watch, especially as we realize the directors are trying to get us to sympathise and laugh with Ben. The small Belgian film has become incredibly popular; a cult favourite, and it remains, while not the best film to deal with the serial killer genre, nonetheless an incredibly smart, shocking and in-your-face explosive look at media influence and obsession.

My Rating:

Average Rating:

Anything you’d like to say about the movie, or my review? Leave a comment below.

Advertisements

About Tyler

Patient observer of all things film and music, from Béla Tarr to Boards of Canada. Foul mouthed and clinging to the edge of sanity.

Posted on July 28, 2011, in Movie Reviews and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink. 8 Comments.

  1. I think you sort of nailed it with the “repetitive” aspect. But that’s really my only beef with it. Good lord, I’m gonna sound like an old guy when I say this, but I think of (what I consider) classic 90’s indie films, the films that defined my high school and college years- films like Clerks, Reservoir Dogs, Pulp Fiction, Trainspotting and In the Company of Men, to name a few- and this movie fits like a glove in that whole movement. It was original, it was inventive, it was violent, it was unique. It’s exactly the kind of movie I think of when I think of 90’s movies.

    • I have to say, I kind of agree with you. It seems to me that the 90s were a more violent decade than the 80s, and was a time when directors became less shy from censorship, especially in foreign film like this.

  2. I remember watching this as a student. I have commented on my little story about what happened when I watched this on Johns site when he recently saw it!!

    I still love the bit with the old lady and the bullet saving death though!!

    Great write up as ever Tyler!

    • Thanks. Yeah, that scene with the old lady was gruesome, and it’s chilling how nonchalantly it’s all played out, and for some reason I laugh everytime he says “Ever been snuffed out, Granny Snuff?!”

  3. cool review tyler, reminding of how much of this film i’ve forgotten in the nearly 10 years since i saw it. i don’t remember liking it or enjoying too much but you make it sound like i should watch it again.

    • Yeah, it’s not a film that’s easy to enjoy, particularly during and after the rape scene. But it’s a clever one, and if you haven’t watched it in ten years, it’s worth seeing again.

  4. Hi, Tyler and company:

    Excellent review!

    John hit on something that has been wriggling in the back of my mind for a while now.

    A lot of our lesser known B movies, noirs and heist flicks make it across the Atlantic to become the kernels that would grow and bear fruit that would be known as the French ‘New Wave’ films of the 1960s.

    It seems the circle has been completed with those same New Wave busted heist flicks becoming the grist that helped put Tarantino on the map with ‘Reservoir Dogs’. Or in this case, where ‘Man Bites Dog’ comes back west across the Atlantic to become the inferior ‘Fifteen Minutes’ with Robert De Niro and Edward Burns.

    One might even posit that from a cinematic point of view, Arthur Penn’s ‘Bonnie and Clyde’ from 1967 was one the first and best New Wave Gangster Films.

    Thanks all, in allowing me to add my two cents.

    • Interesting and valid point, Jack, although I’d like to point out that Bonnie and Clyde was clearly heavily inspired by Jean-Luc Godard’s Breathless (and to a degree, his later film Band of Outsiders), two earlier New Wave films.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: